The nomination of United Arab Emirates diplomat Lana Nusseibeh for the position of United Nations Secretary-General has drawn criticism from Sudanese diaspora communities and international human rights organizations. Critics express concerns about her independence and suitability for the role, citing her past defense of the UAE against allegations of supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
Nusseibeh’s candidacy comes as the UAE seeks to have her succeed António Guterres, whose term ends this year. Her nomination is controversial amid ongoing allegations that the UAE has provided support to the RSF, a group accused of committing widespread atrocities against civilians during Sudan’s civil war. The RSF’s October 2025 attack on El Fasher was described by the United Nations as having characteristics associated with genocide.
Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese women’s rights and pro-democracy activist, has questioned Nusseibeh’s ability to act independently of her government’s position on Sudan, warning that her nomination could undermine efforts to secure justice for victims. Other activists echo these concerns, arguing that her appointment could weaken public confidence in the UN’s ability to hold powerful governments accountable.
Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, criticized Nusseibeh for her previous responses to allegations regarding UAE support for the RSF, suggesting that her rejection of these claims raises concerns about her approach to accountability.
In response, Nusseibeh has defended her candidacy, condemning the RSF’s actions in Sudan and pledging support for UN fact-finding missions and efforts to promote accountability and transitional justice. She has taken leave from her ministerial position in the UAE government, citing the independence required of a UN Secretary-General.
The selection process for the new Secretary-General requires a candidate to receive at least nine affirmative votes in the 15-member UN Security Council and avoid a veto from any of its five permanent members: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, and Russia. The leadership race remains competitive, with former Costa Rican vice-president Rebeca Grynspan previously emerging as a leading candidate. The controversy surrounding Nusseibeh’s nomination adds further uncertainty to the selection process, highlighting broader concerns about the independence of international institutions in ensuring accountability for human rights violations.